• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文OA文献 >Whose standard is it, anyway? How the tobacco industry determines the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards for tobacco and tobacco products
【2h】

Whose standard is it, anyway? How the tobacco industry determines the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards for tobacco and tobacco products

机译：无论如何，这是谁的标准？烟草业如何确定国际标准化组织（ISO）的烟草和烟草制品标准

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

OBJECTIVE—To describe the extent of the tobacco industry involvement in establishing international standards for tobacco and tobacco products and the industry influence on the International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
METHODS—Analysis of tobacco industry documents made public as part of the settlement of the Minnesota Tobacco Trial and the Master Settlement Agreement. Search words included "ISO", "CORESTA", "Barclay", "compensation and machine smoking", "tar and nicotine deliveries", and the name of key players, in different combinations.
RESULTS—It is clear that the tobacco industry, through the Cooperation Centre for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco (CORESTA), play a major role in determining the scientific evidence and suggesting the standards that are eventually adopted as international standards for tobacco and tobacco products in several areas, including the measurement of cigarette tar and nicotine yield.
CONCLUSIONS—ISO's tobacco and tobacco products standards are not adequate to guide tobacco products regulatory policies, and no health claims can be made based on ISO's tobacco products standards. There is an urgent need for tobacco control advocates and groups worldwide to be more involved with the work of the ISO, both directly and through their national standardisation organisations.


Keywords: tar and nicotine measurement; International Organization for Standardization; ISO; Cooperation Centre for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco; CORESTA; regulatory policy
机译：目的—描述烟草业参与建立烟草和烟草制品国际标准的程度以及烟草业对国际标准化组织（ISO）的影响。方法—作为明尼苏达州烟草审判和总和解协议和解协议的一部分，公开分析了烟草业文件。搜索词包括“ ISO”，“ CORESTA”，“巴克莱”，“补偿和机器吸烟”，“焦油和尼古丁交付”以及主要参与者的名称，以不同的组合形式出现。结果—很明显，烟草业通过烟草相关科学研究合作中心（CORESTA）在确定科学证据和建议最终被用作烟草和烟草产品国际标准的标准方面发挥着重要作用。包括香烟焦油和尼古丁产量的测量。结论— ISO的烟草和烟草制品标准不足以指导烟草制品监管政策，并且无法基于ISO的烟草制品标准做出健康声明。迫切需要全世界的烟草控制倡导者和团体直接或通过其国家标准化组织来更多地参与ISO的工作。关键词：焦油和尼古丁含量测定国际标准化组织； ISO;烟草科学研究合作中心；科雷斯塔;监管政策

著录项

  • 作者

    Bialous, S.; Yach, D.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2001
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号